To entertain myself in this period of lull, I'm upgrading my entire home network to Apple's new operating system "Leopard". Leopard is Apple's answer to Windows Vista, except done correctly IMO. It took me nearly two weeks to upgrade a single computer to Windows Vista from Windows XP. Microsoft had so many different versions of Vista that I kept getting the wrong one to match what version of XP I had before. Apple, on the other hand, has a single version of Leopard that includes the same features for all users. They even sell a family pack that allows installation on up to 5 computers. How convenient: my home Apple network has exactly 5 Apple computers. And I don't think Apple counts all that closely. The first computer took just slightly more than an hour to upgrade. As far as I can tell, it was flawless. I found a couple of programs that require upgrades before they will run properly under "Leopard", but none are critical. Most programs just run as is. My second computer upgrade was on my primary network server. This was a leap of faith but I had three backups of the system in case something disastrous happened. I can't say the upgrade went flawlessly, but it only took me one perusal of the Apple newsgroups to figure out how to fix a problem created during the upgrade. It took a little bit longer to download all the needed upgrades to various pieces of the network software and all the utilities I normally use to make life easier. I've been using the updated system for about 6 hours now and I've only run into one piece of software that just plain doesn't run. This piece is important to me, but there are a dozen alternatives I can use in the meantime. While I'm writing this, system number 3 is "doing its thing". I expect no problems there either.
So, if you're bored, have a recent model Apple computer, and want a way to live out the string on a Saturday afternoon, pick up a copy of Apple's Leopard and install it. Your life will be much improved
1 comment:
Hello:
My wife just received her recalculation and i did not understand what they did, is that a surprise? They reworked her total amount at retirement, lower of course, then added Cola for the five years of he retirement based on that lower total, which lowers her monthly payment, then they tell her she still owes $ for overpayment, WHY, what are they talking about? I can only figure they are telling her that she made too much money over the last years without Cola and using the higher ending amount? Then the letter states that her monthly payment will not be reduced at this time, when it is reduced! What is going on? I expect to get mine within the next few months if not sooner and I suppose mine will be the same story, lower monthly and owing $ to PERS. I guess I do not get why they can continue to do this with all that has been ruled?
Thanks for any answers you can give.
Hankenberry
Post a Comment